The United Nations has solicited reports from citizens of the United States regarding our torture by directed energy weapons, and Special Rapporteur Nils Melzer has promised his report to the Human Rights Council in March of 2020.

Activist Post | UN Receives Reports That US Citizens Have Been Tortured (Online)

Activist Post | UN Receives Reports That US Citizens Have Been Tortured (Archived)


Why hasn’t the United Nations done anything to protect people against touchless torture earlier? They didn’t protect Dr. Katherine Horton, who is suing the intelligence agencies in Britain, and they didn’t even acknowledge receipt of information regarding attacks on my friend.

Dr. Katherine Horton – Join Her On Patreon

un ignores dr horton

The answer is simple:  The United Nations is behind these attacks.

The John Birch Society, of which I am a member, has called out the United Nations as a satanic globalist institution that seeks to destroy our country.

Join The John Birch Society!

The United Nations is a front for child rape.

U.N. Peacekeepers Molest Children All Over The World

In a recent article on Activist Post, Janet Phelan describes “mounting concerns that the judiciary in the U.S. is compromised.”  But how about the United Nations?

More on the United Nations and How It Pollutes the Earth

united nations pedophiles 2

There is no question that directed energy weapons are real, and they have been around for over one hundred years.

Tesla Technology – The Origins of HAARP, V2K, and Microwave Harassment

Wardenclyffe Tower (Tesla)

Doctors like Rauni Kilde, the Chief Medical Officer of Finland, have spoken against touchless torture.

Doctors Who Stand Against Microwave Harassment

Directed energy weapons have been used against our embassy workers in Russia, China, and Cuba.

Microwaves in the Cold War – The Moscow Embassy Study (online)

Microwaves in the Cold War: The Moscow Embassy Study (archived)

I suffer constantly from touchless torture, as do many others.

Microwave Harassment and Misdiagnosis


I went to Washington, D.C., last fall, to protest the use of directed energy weapons, microwave harassment, and touchless torture.

Targeted Justice – My Trip To Our Capital

So why am I against a United Nations inquiry?  Why do I disagree so strongly with Janet Phelan’s article, “UN Receives Reports That US Citizens Have Been Tortured,” as published on Activist Post?

bill of rights

Because Janet Phelan gets it so wrong.  Not only does she support a United Nations inquiry, when the United Nations is a globalist institution, supporting the New World Order, attacking the sovereignty of all nations, and perpetrating horrific crimes; but she incorrectly claims that our legal system is inadequate to respond to the commission of these torts.  Janet Phelan claims that “there is no right to sue on a federal level for torture;” and she goes on to say, “The sole federal law governing torture defines it as something occurring outside the borders of the US, therefore making it impossible for domestic victims to sue.”  That’s just plain wrong, and I know because I am a lawyer.

wrong answer

I support Dr. Katherine Horton’s case against the intelligence agencies, for which I have given an affidavit and am ready to testify as a fact witness, and I encourage you to do the same.  Just filling out her affidavit form will help you organize and understand your experience.  It helped me!

The Joint Investigation Team – Appeal for Affidavits

I support Richard Lighthouse’s appeal for affidavits, so we can get writs of mandamus to require prosecutors to pursue deep state criminals.  I have sent him petitions, which takes ten minutes, and I encourage all of you to do the same.

In Only Ten Minutes, You Can Help Prosecute Criminals in the Deep State

I am also interested in Kevin Annett’s movement to set up common law courts to prosecute criminals, and I recommend that people buy his books.

Along those lines, if any of you land on a grand jury, please learn about presentments, through which you can order the prosecution of criminals and crimes.

I wrote an article about how to sue government agencies, including the CIA for abuse under MK-ULTRA, containing judicial opinions and scholarly articles.

FTCA – How To Sue the CIA, NSA, DHS, FBI, NASA, USAF, & Other Bad Guys



Still, if you can identify perpetrators, particular places where you were held, particular people or institutions that tortured you, or particular companies that participated in these crimes, I believe the easiest course is to sue them and only them.  Leaving the government out of the mix will simplify your case.

Keep it simple!

For instance, even though DARPA stands behind our abuse, they’re harder to sue because of the Federal Tort Claims Act.


Instead you might sue Raytheon.  They are a defense contractor full of criminals that facilitates our touchless torture.  I hope someone sues the hell out of them!!!


Hitting someone with a directed energy weapon, with a thrown object, or with a water cannon, just like punching them in the face, or injecting drugs into their arm, is a tort under the common law.  It’s called battery.  It occurs when the defendant intentionally causes harmful or offensive contact.

To win damages in a court case, the tort of battery must be proven more likely than not.  That’s the tiniest bit more than fifty percent–just enough to tip the scales.

scales of justice

A harder tort to prove is intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED).  Here the defendant must intentionally or recklessly cause the plaintiff severe emotional distress by behaving in an outrageous way.  In some jurisdictions this may have a harder standard of proof–clear and convincing evidence or roughly 70% probability.

Then there are torts like products liability, for making dangerous things, or false imprisonment, which some plaintiffs could also bring.

Patents And Patentholders Of The Technology NSA Uses Against Us

Who decides whether you have met the burden of proof? It’s not a judge.  If you make a jury demand, which is your right to do under the United States Constitution, and is a simple matter of checking a box on a form or adding a sentence to your complaint, then a jury of ordinary people will decide whether you win your case.


The sacred right to a jury trial is enshrined not only in our common law but in our constitution, the very things the United Nations attacks.

Seventh Amendment 1

You can sue in state courts where the defendant resides or where you were attacked, or you can sue in federal court if the defendant and you reside in different states and the amount you seek is more than seventy-five thousand dollars.  That’s called diversity jurisdiction, and it is supported by Article III of the Constitution and 28 U.S. Code § 1332.  Those are laws the United Nations seeks to undermine or destroy, and invoking diversity jurisdiction is simply a matter of ticking a box on a federal complaint form.

Sue for damages under the common law, or take the other actions described in this article.  Don’t expect the United Nations to fix your problems.


Return to my homepage, where you can scroll through more articles, by clicking the site title at the top of the page or at

Follow my website, which you can easily do for free.  That way you can get new articles as they come out.

And please retweet or share as many articles as possible.

Our enemy depends on silence.

US Out Of UN


  1. An interesting discussion is worth comment. I do believe that you should publish more on this issue, it might not be a taboo matter but generally folks don’t discuss these subjects. To the next! Many thanks!!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s